Author Archive for: @dmin
About @dmin
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that @dmin contributed 1346 entries already.
Entries by @dmin
Preface
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Silvia Corbella, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminWith the ‘historical’ edition on groups and group psychoanalysis, edited by the research association on homogeneous groups, ARGO, we would like to prospect the recapitulation of the many faces that the theme presents and its different levels – in order to be able to link the notion of the present, social and individual, to that […]
Presentation
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminUsually the annual editions of Argo’s journal Group: Homogeneity and Differences and the quarterly editions of the journal Funzione Gamma of the Sapienza University of Rome, which on the occasion of this ‘historical’ edition have collaborated on a common issue, publish research on general and current group issues and problems. The main inspiration of the […]
Acknowledgements
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Silvia Corbella, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminWith the Argo Association, the editorial staff of Group: Homogeneities and Differences, we would particularly like to thank Giancarlo Di Luzio for the initial inspiration on the historical theme of the edition and the dialogue/interview method with the Authors. We would like to thank Honorary Members Claudio Neri and Bob Hinshelwood for their constant presence […]
Interview with prof. Neri
/in Giancarlo Di Luzio, Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview/by @dmin“MY “HISTORY” WITH THE “PSYCHOANALYTIC GROUP” IN THE PERIOD 1960-2020″.
Group Body
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminMeeting with Simonetta Bruni
Homogeneous Groups Yesterday and Today
/in Adelina Detcheva, Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Nadia Fina/by @dminRound Table with Argo Members
Experiential Group
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview/by @dminInterview with Cono Aldo Barnà
Group analytical seminar
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminInterview with Paolo Boccara
On the concept of fusion
/in Domenico Timpano, Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview/by @dminInterview with Giovanni Meterangelis
Psychoanalysis of Multifamily Groups
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminInterview with Andrea Narracci
The group in care communities
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminInterview with Livio Comin
Interview with Corrado Pontalti
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Nadia Fina/by @dminedited by Nadia Fina
Balint Group: tradition and transformations of group work
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Piera Ferrini/by @dminInterview with Mario Perini
the first 50 years in Milan of therapy in analytically oriented groups
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Silvia Corbella/by @dminDialogue between Silvia Corbella and Alberto Lampignano
Balint Groups
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Teresa Gerace/by @dminTeresa Gerace interviews Piera Ferrini
Experiential Group with object mediator
/in Adelina Detcheva, Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview/by @dminInterview with Lilli Romeo
The experiential group between training and change
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminInterview with Vincenzo De Blasi
Group and Gruppality of the Adolescent Mind
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli/by @dminInterview with Savina Cordiale
The homogeneous group in the treatment of eating disorders
/in Gian Domenico Mosco, Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview/by @dminInterview with Flaminia Cordeschi
Group Liaison Function
/in Group Psychoanalysis 50 years of work report, Interview, Stefania Marinelli, Stefano Carrara/by @dminInterview with Stefano Carrara
Bion and Jung
/in Contents/by @dminIntroducing Bion and Jung
/in Bion and Jung, Stefano Carrara/by @dminThe comparison between Bion’s and Jung’s thought has become, in recent years, a field of growing interest, for a part at least of psychoanalysts and analytical psychologists, the one more open to dialogue and a ‘pluralist’ attitude towards knowledge. This issue of Funzione Gamma stems from Stefania Marinelli’s invitation to explore this field. As a […]
Jung, Bion and social phenomena: Intra-psychic dynamics, inter-psychic dynamics, or something else?
/in Ann Addison, Bion and Jung/by @dminAbstract This paper traces the evolution of Jung’s ideas on the collective and Bion’s ideas on groups stemming from their personal experiences during WWI and their respective observational studies. A comparison of their psychoid and proto-mental concepts on the basis of
When the analyst says ‘I ‘- Examining MAP (1) with Jung and Bion
/in Bion and Jung, Brigitte Allain Dupré/by @dminAbstract Based on a young boy’s therapy, the author retrospectively constructs the analyst’s symbolic thought process when coping with the reifying discourse of biotechnological procedures. With respect to its Jungian origin, the transference is called upon to highlight
From Jung to Bion: an infinite bridge
/in Bion and Jung, Mauro Manica/by @dminAbstract Jung’s thought has underground and profoundly influenced Bion’s work. Ostracized by the mainstream of the more traditional psychoanalytic discourse, the creativity of Jungian research has forcefully re-emerged in Bion’s thought in his revolution of psychoanalytic theory and technique. The Jungian transcendent function, the synergy of conscious and unconscious, has become in Bion’s “binocularity” of […]
On Jung and Bion (with mutual benefit and without harm to either)
/in Bion and Jung, Stefano Carta/by @dminAbstract This article examines the theories of C.G. Jung and W.R. Bion. Their comparison is based on the identification of a paradigm common to the two authors, emerging especially after Bion’s formulation of O. From this common paradigm emerges the possibility of usefully comparing, both in an epistemological and clinical sense, several specific aspects of […]